GRANTLEY v. SAM et al
Filing
42
ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 41 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendants Sam, Enfinger and Nichols' motion to dismiss, ECF No. 37 , is DENIED. Defendants shall file an answer to plaintiff's second amended complaint within 30 days from the date of this order. Plaintiff's claims against defendant S.I. Yun are DISMISSED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 04/17/2018. (MB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
DERRICK GRANTLEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:17cv35-MCR-CJK
E. L. SAM, et al.,
Defendants.
______________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated March 19, 2018. ECF No. 41. The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). No timely objections to the Recommendation have been filed. Having
fully reviewed the Recommendation and the record, the Court has determined that
the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 41, is
adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
Page 2 of 2
2. Defendants Sam, Enfinger and Nichols’ motion to dismiss, ECF No. 37, is
DENIED. Defendants shall file an answer to plaintiff’s second amended complaint
within 30 days from the date of this order.
3. Plaintiff’s claims against defendant S.I. Yun are DISMISSED.
DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of April 2018.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 3:17cv35-MCR-CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?