HENRY v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 3/21/2017. (sdw)

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
MAURICE HENRY,
Plaintiff,
v.

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-41-LC-GRJ

DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant.
__________________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report
and Recommendation dated March 10, 2017 (ECF No. 8). The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the objections filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed
objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should
be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.

The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

Page 2 of 2

2. This case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for
failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of March, 2017.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE