BARCO v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al

Filing 13

ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for plaintiffs failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 11/08/2017. (MB)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION JOSE BARCO, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:17cv96-LC-CJK SGT. S. SMILEY, SGT. S. CHOPP, CAPTAIN GRIFFIN, and WARDEN J. SLOAN, Defendants. ________________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated September 26, 2017 (doc. 9). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and Page 2 of 2 incorporated by reference in this order. 2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 3. The Clerk is directed to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of November, 2017. s/L.A. Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?