LAQUE v. ATKINSON et al
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Clark is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. This matter is referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against defendants Adkinson, Sheppard, and Weeks. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 8/23/2017. (sdw)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
MICHAEL W. LAQUE,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:17cv99-RV-CJK
MICHAEL ADKINSON, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report
and Recommendation dated August 9, 2017 (doc. 19). The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections (doc.
21).
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections
thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should
be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2
2.
Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Clark is
DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for plaintiff’s failure to state a
claim upon which relief can be granted.
3.
This matter is referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further
proceedings on plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim against defendants Adkinson,
Sheppard, and Weeks.
DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of August, 2017.
/s/ Roger Vinson
ROGER VINSON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 3:17cv99-RV-CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?