REED v. GEO GROUP INC et al
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as malicious and that Plaintiff be assessed a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Any pending motion is denied as moot. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 7/18/2017. (sdw)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
LOUIS REED, JR.,
Inmate No. 364012,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No.: 3:17cv126/RV/EMT
GEO GROUP, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report
and Recommendation dated June 20, 2017 (ECF No. 9). Plaintiff has been furnished
a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to
file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No
objections have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the
Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2
2.
This cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as malicious and that Plaintiff be assessed a “strike” under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e).
3.
Any pending motion is denied as moot.
DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of July, 2017.
/s/ Roger Vinson
ROGER VINSON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No.: 3:17cv126/RV/EMT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?