SMITH v. JONES

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Respondent's motion to dismiss (doc. 12 ) is GRANTED The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1 ), challenging petitioner's judgment of conviction and sentence in Stat e of Florida v. Charles Milton Smith, Santa Rosa County Circuit Court Case No. 2014-CF-1135, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The clerk is directed to close the file. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 2/8/2018. (sdw)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION CHARLES M. SMITH, Petitioner, v. Case No. 3:17cv159/RV/CJK JULIE JONES, Respondent. ____________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated January 9, 2018. (Doc. 16). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the objections thereto timely filed (doc. 19), I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 16) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. Page 2 of 2 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (doc. 12) is GRANTED 3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1), challenging petitioner’s judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Charles Milton Smith, Santa Rosa County Circuit Court Case No. 2014-CF-1135, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 4. The clerk is directed to close the file. 5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. ORDERED on this 8th day of February, 2018. /s/ Roger Vinson ROGER VINSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No: 3:17cv159/RV/CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?