NAKDIMEN v. JACKSON et al

Filing 6

ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 5 Report and Recommendation. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiffs failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with an order of the court. The Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/26/2017. (djb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION ADRIAN NAKDIMEN, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 3:17cv213-MCR-CJK ASHLEY NICOLE JACKSON, et al., Defendants. __________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated August 24, 2017. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with an order of the court. 3. The Clerk is directed to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of September, 2017. M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 3:17cv213-MCR-CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?