RUFFIN v. POUPARINAS et al

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This case is DISMISSED as malicious for abuse of the judicial process. The dismissal of this case operates as a "strike" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g). The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 7/19/2017. (sdw)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION MICHAEL RUFFIN, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 3:17cv415-MCR-GRJ M. POUPARINAS, et al., Defendants. _____________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated June 20, 2017. ECF No. 4. The parties have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. Page 2 of 2 2. This case is DISMISSED as malicious for abuse of the judicial process. The dismissal of this case operates as a “strike” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. The clerk is directed to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of July, 2017. s/ M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 3:17cv415-MCR-GRJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?