CROOKS v. JONES et al
Filing
18
ORDER adopting the chief magistrate judge's 14 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiffs 9 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and/or Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED as moot. The second amended complaint is DISMISS ED, without prejudice and with leave to file a third amended complaint within 14 days from the date of this order. If a third amended complaint is not filed, dismissal is with prejudice. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 3/27/2018. (Third Amended Complaint due by 4/10/2018.) (djb)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
THERENCE W. CROOKS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No.: 3:17cv453/RV/EMT
JULIE JONES, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report
and Recommendation dated February 12, 2018 (ECF No. 14). Plaintiff has been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed
objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be
adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2
2.
Plaintiff’s “Motion for Preliminary Injunction and/or Temporary
Restraining Order” (ECF No. 9) is DENIED as moot.
3.
The second amended complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice and
with leave to file a third amended complaint within 14 days from the date of this
order. If a third amended complaint is not filed, dismissal is with prejudice.
DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of March, 2018.
/s/ Roger Vinson
ROGER VINSON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No.: 3:17cv453/RV/EMT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?