BLACKMAN v. CLAY'S HAULING LLC et al

Filing 71

ORDER ADOPTING 69 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendant Clay's Motion to Dismiss Claims, ECF No. 66 , Motion to File Claim, ECF No. 67 , and Motion to File Claim, ECF No. 68 , are DENIED. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 7/30/2019. (sdw)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION MARK BLACKMAN, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 3:17cv456-MCR-HTC CLAY’S HAULING LLC, and ROBERT CLAY, SR., Defendants. _____________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated July 26, 2019. ECF No. 69. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. Page 2 of 2 2. Defendant Clay’s Motion to Dismiss Claims, ECF No. 66, Motion to File Claim, ECF No. 67, and Motion to File Claim, ECF No. 68, are DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of July 2019. s/ M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 3:17cv456-MCR-HTC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?