MALLETY v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al

Filing 5

ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 3 Report and Recommendation. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, as petitioner has not demonstrated entitlement to proceed under § 2241. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 11/16/2017. (alb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION ERNEST MALLETY, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 3:17cv730/MCR/CJK U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Respondents. ____________________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated October 13, 2017. ECF No. 3. Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. Having considered the Report and Recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 3, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, as petitioner has not demonstrated entitlement to proceed under § 2241. 3. The clerk is directed to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of November 2017. s/ M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 3:17cv730/MCR/CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?