SANDERS v. GEO GROUP et al

Filing 36

ORDER adopting Chief Magistrate Judge's 35 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants GEOGroup and Charles Maiorana are DISMISSED with prejudice, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for fa ilure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The case is hereby recommitted to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Williams, Crawford, and Johns. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 11/26/2018. (MB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
MICHAEL QUINCY SANDERS,
Plaintiff,
v.

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-803-MCR-EMT

GEO GROUP, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Chief Magistrate Judge’s
Report and Recommendation dated October 22, 2018 (ECF No. 35). Plaintiff has
been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded
an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code,
Section 636(b)(1). The Court has made a de novo determination of the record, as
Plaintiff has not filed any objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, the Court has
determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.

The Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted

and incorporated by reference in this order.

Page 2 of 2

2.

Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants GEO Group and Charles Maiorana

are DISMISSED with prejudice, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for failure to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted;
3.

The case is hereby recommitted to the assigned magistrate judge for

further proceedings on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants
Williams, Crawford, and Johns.
DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of November 2018.

M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-803-MCR-EMT