SANDERS v. GEO GROUP et al

Filing 47

ORDER adopting the chief magistrate judge's 35 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants GEO Group and Charles Maiorana are DISMISSED with prejudice, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; The case is hereby recommitted to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Williams, Crawford, and Johns. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 3/20/2019. (djb)

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION

MICHAEL QUINCY SANDERS,
Plaintiff,
v.

CASE NO. 3:17cv803-MCR/MJF

GEO GROUP, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report
and Recommendation dated October 22, 2018. ECF No. 35. Plaintiff has been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.1
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections
thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should
be adopted.
1

The Court notes attorney Gary Lee Printy filed an appearance on behalf of Plaintiff;
however, no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. Thus the Court
presumes there are no objections to the Report and Recommendation and Mr. Printy will serve as
legal counsel for Plaintiff in these proceedings going forward.

Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.

The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this Order.
2.

Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants GEO Group and Charles Maiorana

are DISMISSED with prejudice, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for failure to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted;
3.

The case is hereby recommitted to the assigned magistrate judge for

further proceedings on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants
Williams, Crawford, and Johns.
DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of March 2019.

s/

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:17cv803-MCR/MJF