DICKEY et al v. ARDIS

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Ardis' motion to proceed in forma pauperis (docs. 2 , 8 ) is GRANTED for the limited purpose of remanding this case to state court. Escambia County Court Case No. 2017DR004143 is REMANDED to the state court from which it was removed. All pending motions (docs. 7 , 9 ) are DENIED AS MOOT. The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 2/28/2018. (copy mailed to Escambia County Court) (sdw)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION DARLENE DICKEY and SARAH HARPER, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 3:17cv944-RV-CJK ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS, Defendant. ____________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated January 31, 2018 (doc. 10). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto timely filed (doc. 17), I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. Page 2 of 2 2. Ardis’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis (docs. 2, 8) is GRANTED for the limited purpose of remanding this case to state court. 3. Escambia County Court Case No. 2017DR004143 is REMANDED to the state court from which it was removed. 4. All pending motions (docs. 7, 9) are DENIED AS MOOT. 5. The clerk is directed to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of February, 2018. /s/ Roger Vinson ROGER VINSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 3:17cv944-RV-CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?