KINARD v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
Filing
33
ORDER ADOPTING 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The 8 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus challenging petitioner's judgment of convictions and sentences in Escambia County Circuit Court Case Nos. 2014-CF-3493, 2015-CF-0042, and 2015-CF-711 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as time barred. All pending motions are MOOT, and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 7/11/2019. (alb)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
NATHAN MATTHEW KINARD,
Petitioner,
v.
CASE NO. 3:18cv111-MCR-HTC
MARK S. INCH,
Respondent.
_______________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated March 25, 2019. ECF No. 29. The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). The Court has made a de novo determination of any timely filed
objections, ECF No. 30.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections
thereto timely filed, the Court has determined that the Report and Recommendation
should be adopted.
Page 2 of 2
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 29, is
adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2.
The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 8, challenging
petitioner’s judgment of convictions and sentences in Escambia County Circuit Court
Case Nos. 2014-CF-3493, 2015-CF-0042, and 2015-CF-711 is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE as time barred.
3.
The Clerk is directed to close the file.
4.
All pending motions are MOOT, and a certificate of appealability is
DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of July 2019.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 3:18cv111-MCR-HTC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?