RIBBING v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Filing 5

ORDER adopting 3 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiffs 2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis, is GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) due to plaintiffs failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 5/7/2018. (alb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION PATRICK ANTHONY RIBBING, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 3:18cv411-MCR-CJK STATE OF FLORIDA, et al., Defendants. ______________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated March 14, 2018. ECF No. 3. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. Page 2 of 2 2. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2) is GRANTED. 3. This case is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) due to plaintiff’s failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. 4. The clerk is directed to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of May 2018. M. Casey Rodgers s/ M. CASEY RODGERS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 3:18cv411-MCR-CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?