RIBBING v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Filing
5
ORDER adopting 3 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiffs 2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis, is GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) due to plaintiffs failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 5/7/2018. (alb)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
PATRICK ANTHONY RIBBING,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 3:18cv411-MCR-CJK
STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.,
Defendants.
______________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report
and Recommendation dated March 14, 2018. ECF No. 3. The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections
thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should
be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
Page 2 of 2
2.
Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2) is GRANTED.
3.
This case is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) due to
plaintiff’s failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted.
4.
The clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of May 2018.
M. Casey Rodgers
s/
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 3:18cv411-MCR-CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?