CORMIER v. JONES
Filing
25
ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Petitioner Christopher Lynn Cormier (ECF No. 13 ) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. A certificate of appealability and leave to appeal in forma pauperis is also DENIED. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 6/19/2019. (MB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER LYNN CORMIER,
Petitioner,
v.
Case No. 3:18cv444-LC/CAS
MARK S. INCH, Secretary,
Department of Corrections,
Respondent.
_____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Report and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 21)
dated March 27, 2019, recommending that the second amended petition for
writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be denied. The
parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation
and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. I have made a de
novo determination of the timely filed objections.
Having considered the report and recommendation and the
objections filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation
should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
Page 2 of 2
1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by
Petitioner Christopher Lynn Cormier (ECF No. 13) pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 is DENIED. A certificate of appealability and leave to appeal in
forma pauperis is also DENIED.
4. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of June, 2019.
s/ L.A. Collier
LACEY A. COLLIER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 3:18cv444-LC/CAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?