NOLES v. GEVANTE

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal is deemed a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 8/21/2018. (sdw)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION LARRY MARSHALL NOLES, Inmate No. 9991058837 Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 3:18cv788/MCR/EMT GIOVANNI GELANO, et al., Defendants. _____________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated June 21, 2018. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. The complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 3. This dismissal is deemed a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of August 2018. s/ M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 3:18cv788/MCR/EMT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?