RICHARDSON v. BECK
Filing
46
ORDER. The chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 44 ) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with an or der of the court and failure to prosecute. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. RE: 15 Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim, 41 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 02/16/2021. (alb)
Case 3:18-cv-02004-LC-EMT Document 46 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
IVIN ROMON RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No.: 3:18cv2004/LAC/EMT
JENNIFER BECK,
Defendant.
/
ORDER
The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on January
14, 2021 (ECF No. 44). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and
Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title
28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of
the timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections
thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1.
The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No.
44) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2.
This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to
comply with an order of the court and failure to prosecute.
Case 3:18-cv-02004-LC-EMT Document 46 Filed 02/16/21 Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2
3.
All pending motions are DENIED as moot.
4.
The clerk of court is directed to close this case.
DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of February, 2021.
s/L.A. Collier
LACEY A. COLLIER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No.: 3:18v2004/LAC/EMT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?