RICHARDSON v. BECK

Filing 46

ORDER. The chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 44 ) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with an or der of the court and failure to prosecute. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. RE: 15 Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim, 41 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 02/16/2021. (alb)

Download PDF
Case 3:18-cv-02004-LC-EMT Document 46 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION IVIN ROMON RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 3:18cv2004/LAC/EMT JENNIFER BECK, Defendant. / ORDER The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on January 14, 2021 (ECF No. 44). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 44) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an order of the court and failure to prosecute. Case 3:18-cv-02004-LC-EMT Document 46 Filed 02/16/21 Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2 3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. 4. The clerk of court is directed to close this case. DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of February, 2021. s/L.A. Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No.: 3:18v2004/LAC/EMT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?