HERNANDEZ v. INCH
Filing
60
ORDER adopting Chief Magistrate Judge's 57 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's "Protective Order Civil Right Complaint" (ECF No. 55 ), which the undersigned construes as a motion for a temporary restraining order, is DENIED. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 11/17/2021. (mb)
Case 3:20-cv-03650-MCR-EMT Document 60 Filed 11/17/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
WILLIAM HERNANDEZ,
FDOC Inmate No. M27195,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No.: 3:20cv3650/MCR/EMT
MARK S. INCH,
Defendant.
_______________________/
ORDER
The Chief Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on October
8, 2021 (ECF No. 57). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and
Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,
United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). There are no timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the record, I have
determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No.
57) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
Case 3:20-cv-03650-MCR-EMT Document 60 Filed 11/17/21 Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2
2.
Plaintiff’s “Protective Order Civil Right Complaint” (ECF No. 55),
which the undersigned construes as a motion for a temporary restraining order, is
DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of November 2021.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No.: 3:20cv3650/MCR/EMT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?