OWENS v. LEAVINS et al
ORDER adopting Chief Magistrate Judge's 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), based on Plaintiff's failure to pay the filing fee at the time he initiated the action. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this order and close the case. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 1/10/2022. (mb)
Case 3:21-cv-01778-MCR-EMT Document 14 Filed 01/10/22 Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ALBERT T. OWENS, JR.,
FDOC Inmate No. 193166,
Case No.: 3:21cv1778/MCR/EMT
WARDEN DONALD LEAVINS,
The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on
December 16, 2021 (ECF No. 12). The court furnished Plaintiff a copy of the Report
and Recommendation and afforded Plaintiff an opportunity to file objections
pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo
determination of all timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed
objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No.
12) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
Case 3:21-cv-01778-MCR-EMT Document 14 Filed 01/10/22 Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2
This action is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(g), based on Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee at the time he initiated the
All pending motions are DENIED as moot.
The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
order and close the case.
DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of January 2022.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 3:21cv1778/MCR/EMT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?