SANDERS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al

Filing 14

ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Plaintiff is a three-striker under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and has failed to pay the filing fee. The clerk of court is directed to close this case. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 1/11/2022. (mb)

Download PDF
Case 3:21-cv-03871-LC-HTC Document 14 Filed 01/11/22 Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION DARYL A. SANDERS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:21cv3871-LC-HTC FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and OKALOOSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Defendants. ______________________/ ORDER The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on December 27, 2021 (ECF No. 12), recommending dismissal based on Plaintiff’s status as a threestriker under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee at the time he initiated this action. Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and conducted a de novo review of the timely filed objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Case No. 3:21cv3871-LC-HTC Case 3:21-cv-03871-LC-HTC Document 14 Filed 01/11/22 Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Plaintiff is a three-striker under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and has failed to pay the filing fee. 3. The clerk of court is directed to close this case. DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of January 2022. s/L.A. Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 3:21cv3871-LC-HTC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?