DOBEK v. JOSEPH et al

Filing 10

ORDER. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. #5 ) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241 (ECF No. #1 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 09/14/22. (jfj)

Download PDF
Case 3:22-cv-10614-LC-MAF Document 10 Filed 09/14/22 Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION CHRISTOPHER DOBEK Reg. No. 37252-480 Petitioner, v. Case No. 3:22cv10614/LAC/MAF WARDEN M.V. JOSEPH Respondent. ______________________/ ORDER The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on August 4, 2022 (ECF No. 5). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. Case No. 3:22cv285-LAC-MAF Case 3:22-cv-10614-LC-MAF Document 10 Filed 09/14/22 Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. 3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of September, 2022. s/L.A. Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 3:22cv285-LAC-MAF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?