DOBEK v. JOSEPH et al
Filing
10
ORDER. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. #5 ) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241 (ECF No. #1 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 09/14/22. (jfj)
Case 3:22-cv-10614-LC-MAF Document 10 Filed 09/14/22 Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER DOBEK
Reg. No. 37252-480
Petitioner,
v.
Case No. 3:22cv10614/LAC/MAF
WARDEN M.V. JOSEPH
Respondent.
______________________/
ORDER
The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on August 4, 2022
(ECF No. 5). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation
and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States
Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed
objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections
thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1.
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) is
adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
Case No. 3:22cv285-LAC-MAF
Case 3:22-cv-10614-LC-MAF Document 10 Filed 09/14/22 Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2
2.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative
remedies.
3.
The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close
this case.
DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of September, 2022.
s/L.A. Collier
LACEY A. COLLIER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 3:22cv285-LAC-MAF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?