DAVIS v. JOSEPH et al
Filing
11
ORDER. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 10 , is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. Petitioner's pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, ECF No. 2 , is DENIED. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 06/04/24. (jfj)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
CURTIS ALLEN DAVIS
Reg. No. 09497-017
v.
Petitioner,
Case No. 3:23cv3952/MCR/MAL
WARDEN M.V. JOSEPH,
FCI MARIANNA
_________________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge=s Report and
Recommendation dated February 21, 2024. ECF No. 10. The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). There have been no timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the record, I have
determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The magistrate judge=s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 10, is
adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2.
Petitioner’s pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2241, ECF No. 2, is DENIED.
Page 2 of 2
DONE and ORDERED this 4th day of June 2024
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No.: 5:23cv130/MCR/MAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?