JACKSON v. SUMP et al

Filing 50

ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 46 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendant Sump's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 39 ) is GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for Plaintiff Jackson's abuse of the judicial process. The clerk shall close the file. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/25/2024. (mb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION COREY A. JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:23cv24678-MCR-HTC JOSHUA P. SUMP, Defendant. ____________________________/ ORDER The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on August 6, 2024 (ECF No. 46). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 46) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. Defendant Sump’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 39) is GRANTED. Page 2 of 2 3. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for Plaintiff Jackson’s abuse of the judicial process. 4. The clerk shall close the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of September 2024. M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 3:23cv24678-MCR-HTC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?