DAVIS v. QUINN et al
Filing
12
ORDER adopting #7 Report and Recommendation. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) as malicious for abuse of the judicial process due to Plaintiff's failure to accurately disclose his litigation history. The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 6/4/2024. (jcw)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 3:24cv150-MCR-HTC
R. QUINN, et al.,
Defendants.
_____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report
and Recommendation dated April 26, 2024 (ECF No. 7). The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections
thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should
be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2
2.
This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b)(1) as malicious for abuse of the judicial process due to Plaintiff’s failure
to accurately disclose his litigation history.
3.
The clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of June 2024.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 3:24cv150-MCR-HTC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?