CLARK v. SANTA ROSA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Filing
6
ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) due to Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The clerk shall close the file. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 10/25/2024. (mb)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
AMBER MARIE CLARK,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:24cv411-MCR-HTC
SANTA ROSA COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
Defendant.
_________________________/
ORDER
The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation dated September
5, 2024 (ECF No. 5). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and
Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant
to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). There have been no timely filed
objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the record, I have
determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) is
adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
Page 2 of 2
2.
This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) due to Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may
be granted.
3.
The clerk shall close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of October 2024.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 3:24cv411-MCR-HTC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?