STANLEY v. REAMS et al

Filing 30

ORDERED: re 24 Amended Complaint filed by SCOTT A STANLEY. Pltf shall have until 3/11/2009 to provide the Court with two (2) identical copies of second amended complaint for service on Defts. (Service Copies due by 3/11/2009.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLAN KORNBLUM on 2/20/2009. (jws)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION SCOTT STANLEY, Plaintiff, vs. BILL REAMS, et al, Defendants. / ORDER Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a second amended complaint. (Doc. 26). The district judge has remanded this cause back to the undersigned for further proceedings and concluded that the pleading is sufficient to alert Defendants to the nature and basis of Plaintiff's claims. Thus, service of the amended complaint should be directed. At this point, Plaintiff must submit service copies of the amended complaint. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(1), a copy of the amended complaint for each named Defendant is necessary to effect service and must be submitted by Plaintiff. As Plaintiff has named two (2) Defendants in this action, Plaintiff must provide the Court with two additional copies of the amended complaint that are identical to the amended complaint, doc. 26, filed with the Court. Accordingly, it is CASE NO. 4:07cv240-RH/AK Page 2 of 2 ORDERED: Plaintiff shall have until March 11, 2009, to provide the Court with two (2) identical copies of his second amended complaint for service on the Defendants. DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of February, 2009. s/ A. KORNBLUM ALLAN KORNBLUM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case No. 4:07cv240-RH/AK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?