NEWMAN v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that petition be denied and this case be dismissed with prejudice; signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 11/6/08. (tss)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION ALBERT NEWMAN, Petitioner, v. LARRY CAMPBELL, et al. CHIEF JUSTICE, CHIEF OF POLICE, WILLIE MEGGS, US ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondents. ___________________________/ ORDER This matter is before the Court on Doc. 5, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, recommending that the 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition be denied in this case. The Report and Recommendation was originally returned as undeliverable, see Doc. 6, but Mr. Newman filed a change of address form, Doc. 7, and the Clerk remailed the Report and Recommendation to the new address, see Doc. 8, and it was not returned. The Court has allowed Mr. Newman several months to file objections but none have been filed. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Mr. Newman is attempting to litigate, in the guise of a petition challenging his pretrial confinement, affirmative defenses to his upcoming state prosecution. Petitioner demonstrates none of the "special circumstances" required to be shown to allow a federal court to adjudicate CASE NO. 4:08-cv-00058-MP-WCS
Page 2 of 2
the merits of an affirmative defense to a state criminal charge prior to a judgment of conviction by a state court. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. 2. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and incorporated herein. The petition in this case is denied, and the case is dismissed with prejudice.
DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of November, 2008
s/Maurice M. Paul
Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Case No: 4:08-cv-00058-MP-WCS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?