Filing 10

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by ALBERT NEWMAN : It is recommended that this case be DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLAN KORNBLUM on 10/21/2008. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 11/18/2008. (kdm)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION ALBERT NEWMAN, Plaintiff, vs. WILLIAM MEGGS, et al, Defendants. / CASE NO. 4:08CV59-MP/AK REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION By Order dated May 22, 2008, Plaintiff was directed to show cause on or before June 5, 2008, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to file an amended motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 9). There has been no response to the order or other communication from the Plaintiff. A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to prosecute. Link v. Wabash Railroad, 370 U.S. 626, 82 S. Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed2d 734 (1962). Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) also authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failure to obey a court order. Plaintiff has failed to comply with two orders of this Court or otherwise prosecute this action. (Docs. 6 and 9). Page 2 of 2 Consequently, this case should be dismissed. Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED with prejudice. IN CHAMBERS at Gainesville, Florida, this 21st day of October, 2008. s/ A. KORNBLUM ALLAN KORNBLUM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE NOTICE TO THE PARTIES A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations. No. 4:08CV59-MP/AK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?