CURTIS v. UNITED STATES

Filing 101

ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Adopting 93 Report and Recommendation - Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). All pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 7/29/2011. (jws)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION ALAN BOYD CURTIS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO.: 4:09-cv-76-SPM-WCS UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants. _________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 97). The Parties have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff filed an objection (doc. 97). As his supplemental objections (doc. 98) were not timely filed, they will not be considered by the Court. I have conducted a de novo review of the sections of the report to which timely objections (doc. 97) have been made. Upon consideration, I fined that the Plaintiff’s objection is without merit. Even if Plaintiff’s claims are not Heck-barred, his resentencing has mooted his claims regarding the extradition treaty, and his claims are otherwise subject to dismissal. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 93) is adopted and incorporated by reference into this order. 2. The complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 3. All pending motions are denied as moot. DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-ninth day of July, 2011. s/ Stephan P. Mickle Stephan P. Mickle Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?