CURTIS v. UNITED STATES

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 9 Report and Recommendation. Signed by JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 6/04/2009. Plaintiffs complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can b e granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Clerk of Court shall note on the docket that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and thereby constitutes a strike within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). (kdm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION ALAN BOYD CURTIS, Plaintiff, vs. United States, et al., Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 9). Plaintiff was furnished a copy and has filed an objection. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), this Court has made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. Despite Plaintiff's numerous objections, this Court finds that the Report and Recommendation is legally accurate and should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 9) is adopted and incorporated by reference into this order. 2. Plaintiff's complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Case No. 4:09cv76-SPM/WCS Page 2 of 2 3. The Clerk of Court shall note on the docket that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and thereby constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). 4. The Clerk of Court is instructed to close this case. DONE AND ORDERED this fourth day of June, 2009. s/ Stephan P. Mickle Stephan P. Mickle United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?