BOST v. MCNEIL

Filing 4

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO TRANSFER 2254 PETTIION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by RONALD BOST :It is therefore respectfully RECOMMENDED that the case file and any service copies be TRANSFERRED to the United Sta tes District Court for the Middle District of Florida for all further proceedings. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: >10/13/2009. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILLIAM C SHERRILL, JR on 9/15/09. (dlt)

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

RONALD BOST, Petitioner, vs. WALTER A. McNEIL, Respondent. _____________________________/ REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO TRANSFER § 2254 PETITION Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Docs. 1 and 2. Petitioner is currently incarcerated at Everglades Correctional Institution, and challenges the judgment of the Fourth Judicial Circuit Court in Duval County, Florida. Jurisdiction is appropriate in the Southern and Middle Districts, as the districts of confinement and conviction, respectively. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Case No. 4:09cv241-SPM/WCS

Page 2 of 2

The district of conviction would appear to be the most convenient and appropriate venue, and the petition should be transferred to the Middle District of Florida. § 2241(d). See also, Parker v. Singletary, 974 F.2d 1562, 1582 and nn. 114 and 118 (11th Cir. 1992) (finding transfer "in furtherance of justice" under § 2241(d), citations omitted); Eagle v. Linahan, 279 F.3d 926, 933, n. 9 (11th Cir. 2001) (noting that the practice in district courts in Georgia was to transfer petitions to the district of conviction under § 2241(d)). It is therefore respectfully RECOMMENDED that the case file and any service copies be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida for all further proceedings. IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida on September 15, 2009.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO PARTIES Within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation, a party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:09cv241-SPM/WCS