CROOK v. ABBOTT

Filing 13

ORDER VACATING 7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Clerk to note this dismissal is pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 4/27/2010. (jws)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION RONNY H CROOK, Plaintiff, v. MARY FRANCES ABBOTT, et al, Defendants. _____________________________/ ORDER Plaintiff, an inmate of the Florida penal system proceeding pro se, has filed an amended civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 6). Although he was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, additional information has been obtained by the Court about Plaintiff's prior filings in the Middle District of Florida, and that Order (doc. 7) granting leave to proceed is hereby VACATED. The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), which was enacted on April 26, 1996, provides that a prisoner may not bring a civil action in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915: if the prisoner has, on 3 or more occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff has had three or more prior prisoner actions dismissed in the Middle District of Florida on the grounds that they were frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim. The CASE NO. 4:09-cv-00430-MP-AK Page 2 of 2 dismissed cases include cases numbered 3:05cv396-JHM-MCR; 3:05cv545-UA-MMH; 3:04cv1160-UA-MMH; and 3:04cv738-JHM-HTS for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Such cases fall within the category of failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Rivera v. Allin, 144 F.3d 719, 731 (11th Cir. 1998). Additionally, Plaintiff has had cases dismissed as frivolous, 3:05cv356-TC-MMH, and for failure to be truthful about prior cases, 3:05cv395-HES-HTS; and 3:05cv593-J-16HTS. He has also had one case dismissed in the Northern District of Florida for failure to state a claim, 4:09cv275-RS/WCS. The latest complaint filed (Plaintiff has filed three complaints each one against different defendants and concerning different incidents) alleges that Defendant searched his laundry for contraband and made "sexual jokes" about Plaintiff in front of other inmates which was embarrassing. These allegations do not bring him within the "imminent danger" exception. Because Plaintiff has had at least three prior dismissals and is not under imminent danger of serious physical injury, his request to proceed in forma pauperis is denied and this action is dismissed. The dismissal is without prejudice to him making the same allegations in a complaint for which he pays the full $350.00 filing fee at the time of filing the complaint. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. That the Order granting leave to proceed (doc. 7) is VACATED. 2. That this cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is to note that this dismissal is pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of April, 2010 s/Maurice M. Paul Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge Case No: 4:09-cv-00430-MP-AK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?