BARBER v. MCNEIL
Filing
43
ORDER DENYING THE AMENDED PETITION AND DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. The Report and Recommendation 41 is ACCEPTED. "The amended petition is DENIED with prejudice." A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Leave to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 6/5/2012. (dlt)
Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
TONY BARBER,
Petitioner,
v.
CASE NO. 4:09cv453-RH/CAS
KENNETH S. TUCKER,
Respondent.
_________________________________/
ORDER DENYING THE AMENDED PETITION AND
DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
This amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is
before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, ECF No.
41, and the objections, ECF No. 42. I have reviewed de novo the issues raised by
the objections. The report and recommendation is correct and is adopted as the
court’s opinion.
Rule 11 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases requires a district court to
“issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to
the applicant.” Under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), a certificate of appealability may
issue “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a
Case No. 4:09cv453-RH/CAS
Page 2 of 3
constitutional right.” See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-38 (2003);
Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000); Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880,
893 n.4 (1983); see also Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 402-13 (2000) (setting
out the standards applicable to a § 2254 petition on the merits). As the Court said
in Slack:
To obtain a COA under § 2253(c), a habeas prisoner must make a
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a
demonstration that, under Barefoot, includes showing that reasonable
jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition
should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues
presented were “ ‘adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed
further.’ ”
Slack, 529 U.S. at 483-84 (quoting Barefoot, 463 U.S. at 893 n.4). Further, in
order to obtain a certificate of appealability when dismissal is based on procedural
grounds, a petitioner must show, “at least, that jurists of reason would find it
debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional
right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court
was correct in its procedural ruling.” Id. at 484.
The petitioner has not made the required showing.
For these reasons,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED.
Case No. 4:09cv453-RH/CAS
Page 3 of 3
2. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The amended petition is
DENIED with prejudice.”
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
4. Leave to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED.
5. The clerk must close the file.
SO ORDERED on June 5, 2012.
s/Robert L. Hinkle
United States District Judge
Case No. 4:09cv453-RH/CAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?