WRIGHT v. YOUNG, et al

Filing 23

ORDER re 22 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Amended Complaint) filed by THOMPSON, PETERSON: Plaintiff shall respond by 1/30/2012. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 12/9/2012. (jws)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION HARRY MICHAEL WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-474-SPM-GRJ MORRIS YOUNG, et al., Defendants. ____________________________/ ORDER On December 6, 2011, Defendants Keyshonda Thompson and Lamonte Peterson filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 22.) N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(C)(1) provides “Each party opposing a motion shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of service of the motion in which to file and serve a responsive memorandum with citation of authorities in opposition to the motion.” As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has neither filed a response nor filed a motion for an extension of time to respond to the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff shall respond to the Motion To Dismiss filed by Defendants Keyshonda Thompson and Lamonte Peterson (Doc. 22) on or before January 30, 2012. 2. Failure to comply with this Order in the allotted time will result in a recommendation to the district judge that the motion to dismiss be granted pursuant to N.D.Fla.Loc. Rule 7.1(C) for failure to file a responsive memorandum. DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of January 2012. s/Gary R. Jones GARY R. JONES United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?