JOSEPH V GORMAN
ORDER ADOPTING 51 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant. Plaintiff's equal protection and Fourth Amendment claims are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, claim against defendant in his official capacity is DISMISSED due to the Eleventh Amendment, but otherwise, the motion is DENIED. Case is REMANDED to magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/17/2012. (jws)
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
JEAN E JOSEPH,
CASE NO. 4:11cv34-MP-CAS
OFFICER R. GORMAN,
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and
Recommendation dated March 12, 2012. (Doc. 51). The parties have been furnished a
copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file
objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections were
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto
timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
Defendant's motion to dismiss( doc. 38) is GRANTED in part and DENIED
in part. Plaintiff's equal protection and Fourth Amendment claims are DISMISSED for
failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, the claim against defendant in
his official capacity is DISMISSED due to the Eleventh Amendment, but otherwise, the
motion is DENIED.
This case is REMANDED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.
DONE and ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2012.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?