CHESTNUT v. PETERSEN
Filing
34
ORDER re 32 Objection to R&R filed by GERNARD CHESTNUT, construed as a Motion for Reconsideration, is GRANTED. 31 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION is VACATED. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILLIAM C SHERRILL, JR on 3/7/2012. (jws)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
GERNARD CHESTNUT,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No. 4:11cv225-MP/WCS
CAPT. KIMBERLY PETERSEN,
et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, submitted a sixth amended complaint, doc. 26, and it
was reviewed and deemed sufficient. Plaintiff was directed to submit to the Court
"seven identical copies of his sixth amended complaint for service on the Defendants."
Doc. 27. That order was returned to the Court with a notation that Plaintiff "refused to
sign" for the mail. Doc. 30. A report and recommendation was entered recommending
dismissal for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. Doc. 31. Plaintiff has filed a document in
response which is construed as a motion for reconsideration. Doc. 32. Plaintiff states
that he received the report and recommendation and asserts he did not refuse to sign
for the mail. Plaintiff contends that jail officials have conspired to delay and tamper with
his legal mail. Doc. 32. Plaintiff has simultaneously provided the service copies with
Page 2 of 2
the motion for reconsideration. Doc. 33. Thus, the report and recommendation will be
vacated and in a separate order, service will be directed on Plaintiff's behalf.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff's objection, doc. 32, construed as a motion for reconsideration, is
GRANTED.
2. The report and recommendation, doc. 31, is VACATED.
DONE AND ORDERED on March 7, 2012.
S/
William C. Sherrill, Jr.
WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case No. 4:11cv225-MP/WCS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?