PHILO v. REAMS, et al
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 115 Report and Recommendation. Defendant's 90 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. The case is referred to Magistrate Judge Jones for further proceedings. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 3/11/2014. (Clear Flags - R&R) (djb)
Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
RONDY ALEXIS PHILO,
Case No.: 4:11cv394/MCR/GRJ
Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
dated February 5, 2014 (doc. 115). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report
and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,
United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No timely objections have been filed. Having fully
considered the Report and Recommendation and the record, the Court concludes that the
Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 115) is adopted
and incorporated by reference in this Order and Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment (doc. 90) is DENIED.
The case is referred to Magistrate Judge Jones for further proceedings.
DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of March, 2014.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?