SCHILLER v. MERCER

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING 11 SECOND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Case is DISMISSED for Plaintiff's failure to comply with court orders to prosecute this case. All pending motions are DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 2/14/2012. (jws)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION ANTHONY LEON SCHILLER, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO.: 4:11-cv-405-SPM/WCS N.E. MERCER, et al., Defendants. ____________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING SECOND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Second Report and Recommendation (doc. 11). Plaintiff filed objections to the report (doc. 12). Upon consideration, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation is correct and should be adopted. Plaintiff contends that he could not submit an in forma pauperis motion because prison officials would not provide Plaintiff with copies of his inmate bank account information. The Magistrate Judge instructed Plaintiff to provide the Court with documentary support (copies of inmate request forms and responses) demonstrating that Plaintiff has attempted to obtain his account statements and to comply with a court order. To date, Plaintiff has still not submitted a copy of an inmate request form where he previously attempted to obtain his bank account statement. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Second Report and Recommendation (doc. 11) is adopted and incorporated by reference into this order. 2. This case is dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with court orders to prosecute this case. 3. All pending motions are denied. DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of February, 2012. S/ Stephan P. Mickle Stephan P. Mickle Senior United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?