VALE v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION

Filing 9

ORDER adopting 4 Report and Recommendation;DENYING 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, DENYING 8 MOTION For Leave To Supplement Exhibit. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 12/12/2011. Plaintiffs complaint (doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (kdm)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION EDWARD VALE, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 4:11cv501-MP-WCS FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. _____________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated October 11, 2011. (Doc. 4). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2) is DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) 3. Plaintiff’s complaint (doc.1) is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 4. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file supplemental exhibit (doc. 8) is DENIED. DONE and ORDERED this 12th day of December, 2011. s/ M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?