BRUNO v. JONES

Filing 25

ORDER adopting 24 Report and Recommendation.; granting 18 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 11/16/2012. This case is dismissed without prejudice as a sanction for Plaintiffs abuse of the judicial process in not providing the Court with true factual statements and responses on the complaint form. The dismissal is also ordered pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), which the clerk shall note on the docket. (kdm)

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
PAUL JOSEPH BRUNO,
Plaintiff,
v.

CASE NO. 4:12cv44-SPM/CAS

WILLIAM JONES and
C.E. RICHARDSON,
Defendants.
______________________________/

ORDER
THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and
recommendation dated October 16, 2012 (doc. 24). Plaintiff has been afforded
an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.
I have determined that the report and recommendation should be
adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.

The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 24) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.
2.

The motion to dismiss (doc. 18) is granted. This case is dismissed

Page 2 of 2

without prejudice as a sanction for Plaintiff’s abuse of the judicial process in not
providing the Court with true factual statements and responses on the complaint
form.
3.

The dismissal is also ordered pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(i), which the clerk shall note on the docket.
DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of November, 2012.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle
Stephan P. Mickle
Senior United States District Judge

CASE NO. 4:12cv44-SPM/CAS