FULWOOD v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS

Filing 32

ORDER ADOPTING 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Plaintiff's 29 Fourth Amended Complaint is DISMISSED as to all claims except plaintiff's First Amendment claims against ARNOLD and PRITT. Plaintiff's 29 request for this case to proceed as a class action suit is DENIED. Plaintiff shall file a fifth amended complaint limited to his First Amendment claims against ARNOLD and PRITT. Case is REMANDED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.(Amended Pleadings due by 3/15/2013.). Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 2/19/2013. (jws)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION LENNIE FULWOOD, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 4:12cv156-SPM/CAS CHARLES E. SAMUEL, JR., et al., Defendants. ______________________________/ ORDER THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated January 9, 2012. (Doc. 30). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 30) is ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint (doc. 29) is DISMISSED as to all claims except plaintiff’s First Amendment claims against defendants Arnold and Pritt. 3. Plaintiff’s request for this case to proceed as a class action suit (doc. 29) is DENIED. 4. On or before March 15, 2013, plaintiff shall file a fifth amended complaint limited to his First Amendment claims against defendants Arnold and Pritt. 5. This case is remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of February, 2013. s/ M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?