REILLY v. CAMPBELL

Filing 28

ORDER DENYING LEAVE AND REMANDING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS: 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court's opinion. Plaintiff's 23 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint is DENIED. This matter is REMANDED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 2/24/2013. (jws)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION SEAN PATRICK REILLY, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 4:12cv304-RH/CAS LARRY CAMPBELL, and LUIS MORENO et al., Defendants. _____________________________/ ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO AMEND AND REMANDING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, ECF No. 26, and the objections, ECF No. 27. I have reviewed de novo the issues raised by the objections. In Florida, a county sheriff is a constitutional officer separate and apart from the Board of County Commissioners. The county sheriff typically operates the county jail. The defendant Larry Campbell, in his official capacity as the Sheriff of Leon County, operates the Leon County jail. For claims like the plaintiff’s, arising from policies in force at the Leon County jail, the proper official-capacity Case No. 4:12cv304-RH/CAS Page 2 of 2 defendant is the Sheriff, not the Board of County Commissioners. The plaintiff has alleged no facts indicating that the Board of County Commissioners enacted the policies at issue or had the capacity to do so. IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s opinion. The plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend his complaint, ECF No. 23, is DENIED. This matter is remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. SO ORDERED on February 24, 2013. s/Robert L. Hinkle United States District Judge Case No. 4:12cv304-RH/CAS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?