COLSON v. MURPHCO OF FLORIDA INC

Filing 12

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Plaintiff's 11 unopposed motion to continue the trial and extend deadlines is GRANTED IN PART. Discovery due by 5/29/2013., Pretrial Order due by 7/9/2013., Pretrial Stipulation due by 7/23/2013., Jury Trial set for 9/3/2013 08:15 AM in U.S. Courthouse Tallahassee before JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE. Clerk must reschedule pretrial conference for first available date on or before 8/15/2013. No further extensions of discover deadline or trial date will be granted absent extraordinary, unforeseeable circumstances. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 2/20/2013. (jws)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION KENTA COLSON, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 4:12cv374-RH/CAS MURPHCO OF FLORIDA, INC., Defendant. _______________________________/ AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER IT IS ORDERED: 1. The plaintiff’s unopposed motion to continue the trial and extend deadlines, ECF No. 11, is GRANTED IN PART. 2. The discovery deadline is extended to May 29, 2013. 3. The trial is continued to the trial period that begins on Tuesday, September 3, 2013. A party with a conflict during that trial period must file a notice by March 6, 2013. 4. The deadline for the attorney conference required by the Order for Pretrial Conference, ECF No. 9, is extended to July 9, 2013. The deadline for Case No. 4:12cv374-RH/CAS Page 2 of 2 filing the pretrial stipulation and other papers required by paragraphs III and IV of the Order for Pretrial Conference is extended to July 23, 2013. The clerk must reschedule the pretrial conference for the first available date on or after August 15, 2013. 5. No further extensions of the discovery deadline or trial date will be granted absent extraordinary, unforeseeable circumstances. SO ORDERED on February 20, 2013. s/Robert L. Hinkle United States District Judge Case No. 4:12cv374-RH/CAS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?