URBIN v. CREWS
Filing
8
ORDER FOR TRANSFER; adopting 4 Report and Recommendation. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 4/19/2013. This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. The clerk must take all steps necessary to effect the transfer. (kdm)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
RYAN URBIN,
Petitioner,
v.
CASE NO. 4:13cv52-RH/CAS
MICHAEL D. CREWS,
Respondent.
_____________________________/
ORDER FOR TRANSFER
This petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is before
the court on the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, ECF No. 4, and the
objections, ECF No. 7. I have reviewed de novo the issues raised by the
objections.
The report and recommendation correctly concludes that this case was
improperly filed in the Northern District of Florida. The petitioner now
acknowledges this. As correctly noted in the report and recommendation, § 2241
allows a petition to be filed in the district where the underlying conviction was
entered or the district where the petitioner is in custody. So this case could
Case No. 4:13cv52-RH/CAS
Page 2 of 2
properly be transferred to either the Middle District of Florida, where the
underlying state-court conviction was entered, or the Southern District of Florida,
where the petitioner is now in custody. The petitioner asks for transfer to the
Southern District, but transfer to the Middle District—where the underlying
conviction was entered and the discipline at issue was imposed—will be more
convenient. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as the court’s
further opinion. This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Florida. The clerk must take all steps necessary to effect the
transfer.
SO ORDERED on April 19, 2013.
s/Robert L. Hinkle
United States District Judge
Case No. 4:13cv52-RH/CAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?