URBIN v. CREWS

Filing 8

ORDER FOR TRANSFER; adopting 4 Report and Recommendation. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 4/19/2013. This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. The clerk must take all steps necessary to effect the transfer. (kdm)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION RYAN URBIN, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 4:13cv52-RH/CAS MICHAEL D. CREWS, Respondent. _____________________________/ ORDER FOR TRANSFER This petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, ECF No. 4, and the objections, ECF No. 7. I have reviewed de novo the issues raised by the objections. The report and recommendation correctly concludes that this case was improperly filed in the Northern District of Florida. The petitioner now acknowledges this. As correctly noted in the report and recommendation, § 2241 allows a petition to be filed in the district where the underlying conviction was entered or the district where the petitioner is in custody. So this case could Case No. 4:13cv52-RH/CAS Page 2 of 2 properly be transferred to either the Middle District of Florida, where the underlying state-court conviction was entered, or the Southern District of Florida, where the petitioner is now in custody. The petitioner asks for transfer to the Southern District, but transfer to the Middle District—where the underlying conviction was entered and the discipline at issue was imposed—will be more convenient. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as the court’s further opinion. This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. The clerk must take all steps necessary to effect the transfer. SO ORDERED on April 19, 2013. s/Robert L. Hinkle United States District Judge Case No. 4:13cv52-RH/CAS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?