DAVIS v. CITY OF PERRY

Filing 23

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL - The parties and the mediator have filed notices indicating that this case has been settled. ECF Nos. 17 , 18 , and 22 . The clerk must enter judgment stating, "The parties are ordered to comply with th eir settlement agreement. The court reserves jurisdiction to enforce the order to comply with the settlement agreement. All claims in this case are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41." Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 12/6/2013. (dlt)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION GLENDA DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 4:13cv83-RH/CAS CITY OF PERRY, Defendant. __________________________/ ORDER FOR DISMISSAL The parties and the mediator have filed notices indicating that this case has been settled. ECF Nos. 17, 18, and 22. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The parties must comply with their settlement agreement. 2. All claims other than for enforcement of the settlement agreement are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. 3. Jurisdiction is retained to enforce the order to comply with the settlement agreement. Page 2 of 2 4. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The parties are ordered to comply with their settlement agreement. The court reserves jurisdiction to enforce the order to comply with the settlement agreement. All claims in this case are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.” 5. The clerk must close the file. 6. A party who objects to the terms of this order or the judgment to be entered based on this order must file a timely motion to alter or amend under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). SO ORDERED on December 6, 2013. s/Robert L. Hinkle United States District Judge Case No: 4:13cv83-RH/CAS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?