MCCROAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA, et al

Filing 11

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 6/24/2013. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, Plaintiffs Complaint, ECF No. 1 , is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted as to the State of Florida and Defendant Marsh, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e) (2)(B)(ii), and because Defendants Wright and Redmon are immune from such relief pursuant to §1915(2)(B)(iii). The Clerk shall note on the docket that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), (iii). The Clerk shall close the file. (kdm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION WILLIAM TONY McROAN Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 4:13-cv-272-MW/CAS JUDGE WILLIAM L. WRIGHT, et al., Defendants. *************************** ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has considered the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 7, filed June 4, 2013. The Court has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff’s Motion to Object to the Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 8, filed June 20, 2013. Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as the Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Plaintiff’s Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief 1 may be granted as to the State of Florida and Defendant Marsh, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), and because Defendants Wright and Redmon are immune from such relief pursuant to §1915(2)(B)(iii).” The Clerk shall note on the docket that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), (iii). The Clerk shall close the file. SO ORDERED on June 24, 2013. s/Mark E. Walker United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?