ROGERS v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE et al
Filing
17
ORDER DISMISSING THE CLAIMS AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS ROBERTS, NEWHOUSE, AND CONNELL - The complaint's counts I, III, and V against the defendants Ronald Roberts, Jason Newhouse, and Kathy Connell are dismissed with prejudice. Th ese defendants' summary-judgment motion, ECF No. 11 , is DENIED AS MOOT. I do not direct the entry of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). The claims against City of Tallahassee and Wesley Hawkins remain pending. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 1/3/2014. (dlt)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
DERRICK ROGERS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 4:13cv411-RH/CAS
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE et al.,
Defendants.
__________________________________/
ORDER DISMISSING THE CLAIMS AGAINST THE
DEFENDANTS ROBERTS, NEWHOUSE, AND CONNELL
Based on the plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice, ECF
No. 16,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The complaint’s counts I, III, and V against the defendants Ronald
Roberts, Jason Newhouse, and Kathy Connell are dismissed with prejudice.
2.
These defendants’ summary-judgment motion, ECF No. 11, is
DENIED AS MOOT.
3.
I do not direct the entry of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 54(b).
Case No. 4:13cv411-RH/CAS
Page 2 of 2
4.
The claims against City of Tallahassee and Wesley Hawkins remain
pending.
SO ORDERED on January 3, 2014.
s/Robert L. Hinkle
United States District Judge
Case No. 4:13cv411-RH/CAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?