ROGERS v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE et al

Filing 17

ORDER DISMISSING THE CLAIMS AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS ROBERTS, NEWHOUSE, AND CONNELL - The complaint's counts I, III, and V against the defendants Ronald Roberts, Jason Newhouse, and Kathy Connell are dismissed with prejudice. Th ese defendants' summary-judgment motion, ECF No. 11 , is DENIED AS MOOT. I do not direct the entry of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). The claims against City of Tallahassee and Wesley Hawkins remain pending. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 1/3/2014. (dlt)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION DERRICK ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 4:13cv411-RH/CAS CITY OF TALLAHASSEE et al., Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER DISMISSING THE CLAIMS AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS ROBERTS, NEWHOUSE, AND CONNELL Based on the plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice, ECF No. 16, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The complaint’s counts I, III, and V against the defendants Ronald Roberts, Jason Newhouse, and Kathy Connell are dismissed with prejudice. 2. These defendants’ summary-judgment motion, ECF No. 11, is DENIED AS MOOT. 3. I do not direct the entry of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Case No. 4:13cv411-RH/CAS Page 2 of 2 4. The claims against City of Tallahassee and Wesley Hawkins remain pending. SO ORDERED on January 3, 2014. s/Robert L. Hinkle United States District Judge Case No. 4:13cv411-RH/CAS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?