MAGPUL INDUSTRIES CORP v. GOTTLIEB et al
Filing
39
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - ACCEPTED 38 Stipulation filed by MATTHEW GOTTLIEB, RUDY'S RA1 ACCESSORIES. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response to complaint if no settlement reached not filed earlier: 12/23/2013).). Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 12/2/2013. (dlt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
MAGPUL INDUSTRIES CORP.,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 4:13-cv-439-MW/CAS
MATTHEW GOTTLIEB,
RUDY’S RA1 ACCESSORIES,
and DOES 1-100,
Defendants.
____________________________/
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
This Court has considered, without hearing, the Stipulation Requesting an
Order Be Entered Extending the Date to Respond to Complaint, ECF No. 38, filed
November 26, 2013.
The parties have stipulated they are in settlement
negotiations and believe a full resolution of the case is possible without the need of
a response to the Complaint. This Courts accepts the stipulation. The deadline for
filing an Answer to the Complaint is extended to December 23, 2013, in the event
a settlement is not reached prior to that date.
SO ORDERED on December 2, 2013.
s/Mark E. Walker
United States District Judge
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?