MAGPUL INDUSTRIES CORP v. GOTTLIEB et al

Filing 39

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - ACCEPTED 38 Stipulation filed by MATTHEW GOTTLIEB, RUDY'S RA1 ACCESSORIES. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response to complaint if no settlement reached not filed earlier: 12/23/2013).). Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 12/2/2013. (dlt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION MAGPUL INDUSTRIES CORP., Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 4:13-cv-439-MW/CAS MATTHEW GOTTLIEB, RUDY’S RA1 ACCESSORIES, and DOES 1-100, Defendants. ____________________________/ ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT This Court has considered, without hearing, the Stipulation Requesting an Order Be Entered Extending the Date to Respond to Complaint, ECF No. 38, filed November 26, 2013. The parties have stipulated they are in settlement negotiations and believe a full resolution of the case is possible without the need of a response to the Complaint. This Courts accepts the stipulation. The deadline for filing an Answer to the Complaint is extended to December 23, 2013, in the event a settlement is not reached prior to that date. SO ORDERED on December 2, 2013. s/Mark E. Walker United States District Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?